Nešto malo o dobroj i lošoj prezentaciji

Već smo se upoznali sa radom Berci Meska i njegovim naučnim blogom Medicine 2.0. , Genetics 2.0 koji se bavi personalizovanom medicinom i genetikom.
Bertaland Mesko, danas već vodeća ličnost među internet menadžerima i medicinskim blogerima shvatio je kao student genetike značaj naučnih blogova i web 2.0 za razvoj medicine i nauke, pokrenuo svoje blogove i sajtove i na taj način nauku učinio dostupnom svima, a korisnim svim medicinskim i naučnim radnicima onima koji se bave bilo kojom granom medicine.

Berci je pokrenuo novi websajt i blog - Webicina , u kojem sakuplja naučne radove na razne teme iz medicine. Na njegovom website možemo naći sakupljene blogove koji tretiraju -Cancer 2.0 , informacije ya pacijente, Radiology 2.0

Jedna od zanimljivosti na njegovom blogu je svakako

How to give a bad presentation

Richard Smith described how to give a bad presentation in an article published in the British Medical Journal. Some excerpts from the essay:

• Not to prepare at all. Step up to the platform, open your mouth, and see what comes out.
  
• If the audience is composed of 15 year olds then prepare a complex talk that would baffle a collection of Nobel prize winners.
• Be sure to prepare a presentation that is the wrong length. Too long is much the best.
• Poorly filmed videos that are long and incomprehensible; ...and Powerpoint presentations that use every feature the software offers.
• Bad slides are the traditional standby of a bad presentation. There must be far too many.
• Never look at the audience. Mumble your presentation, and preferably read it.
• A truly bad presentation rarely produces any questions.

How not to give a presentation (by Comedian Don McMillan ):

preuzeto sa www.webicina.com

Article from PLoS ARTICLE LEVEL METRICS

Article-Level Metrics (at PLoS and beyond)

Tags: PLoS PLoS ONE PLoSONE ONE Journal articlelevelmetrics article level metrics binfield COUNTER onlineusage usage academicjournals academic journals journals library Public Library of Science science citations openaccess OA

BORA ZIVKOVIC presented PLOS ONE – PUBLISHING ONLINE

Prošle nedelje je, od 14 . do 17. januara održana čuvena Konferencija , iako tek četvrta po redu, ScienceOnline2010 u Chapel Hill-u , North Carolina. Ko stoji iza konferencije?- Naravno Bora Živković sa svojim kolegama, naučnim blogerima Anton Zuiker, Stephanie Willen Brown i David Kroll.
Privukavši sponzore, kolege volontere,  trud ovih ljudi se isplatio. jer veliki uspeh  uzbudljive i zabavne ScienceOnline konferencije nije izostao .
ScienceOnlineConference  zaista je bila Wonder-Conference!

Ovo zaključujemo po reakcijama učesnika Konferencije, koji ne samo da su ova tri dana proveli radno, već su se i dobro zabavili jer, složićete se, publikovanje online i social networking "is fun"!!!

Konferencija je bila posvećena istraživačima, naučnicima i načinu publikovanja online, kako bi se u budućnosti lakše evaluirao njihov rad. Zašto je ovo važno?
Način vrednovanja će se promeniti, IF će "umreti" a mladi istrazivači će se naći u čudu... pitaće se kako da dostignu poene za napredovanje u karijeri?? ..

POENE?  Poeni će takodje nestati, ali jedno je siguno: VREDNOVANJE RADOVA PREMA NIVOU STATISTIKE POSEĆENOSTI NAUČNIH PORTALA, BLOGOVA (Article Level Metrics) , DOWNLOADS , AUTORSTVO NAUČNIH BLOGOVA, ĆE BITI PRESUDNO!!!!
Ali avaj! šta da rade mladi istraživači kojima je primarno bilo tradicionalno vrednovanje - pomoću faktora uticaja časopisa?
Umesto da su naučili da cene svoj trud , učeni su da vrednuju u koji časopis da pošalju rad.
A kako delaju naučnici u svetu i kako se bore protiv tradicionalnog lošeg sistema zanimljivo je videti na ScienceOnline konferencijama. Otvoreni pristup je naučnim radnicima pružio nove mogućnosti.

Šta je bio program Konferencije?
Nadam se da će nam koleginica Danica Radovanovic, koja je bila učesnik na ScienceOnline2009, i ScienceOnline2010 napisati koju reč o tome kako je bilo u Chapel Hillu.

Teme konferencije su bile:

• Od bloga do knjige
• Društvenim mrežama i naučnom informisanju
• Otvorenom pristupu
• Wiki
• Trixie Tracker - web and phone
• Etika u oblacima
• Twitter
• Podcasting i nauka
  
• Etika
• Vizualizacija u nauci
• O naučnom blogovanju
• Nauka i Second Life
• Naučnom obrazovanju
• Online Reference Managers
• Poverenju i kritičkom mišljenju
• Web Science: Proučavanje i uticaj World Wide Web, kako transformiše naše društvo

Ono čime se ovogodišnja Konferencija razlikovala od prethodnih je sigurno prenošenje konferencije preko Twittera.

A evo kako su rasli:

Overarching Themes

It is interesting how the conference evolved over the past four years. The first meeting was all about blogging - all sessions and conversations were about the way people use blogs to do, teach and communicate science. Most of the people gathered back in 2007 were bloggers. But things have changed over time...more about it in a second.

The 2008 meeting started expanding from blogs to other stuff scientists and those interested in science do online. If there was a theme, it was Activism - how to use blogs and other online tools to push back against enemies of reason and also how to influence the influentials (especially elected officials at various levels).

The 2009 meeting had one huge underlying theme - that of Power. But the other big theme then was Openness. We talked a lot about everything Open - from Open Notebook Science to Open Access Publishing. It was an appropriate year to have a lot of focus on it as this was the time when Open Access movement made huge strides, many scientists first became aware of Open Access and what it is, and many scientists were first made aware of the bankruptcy of the Impact Factor.

Since then, the emotions about it have calmed down a little bit - there is a sense that "good guys won" (the NIH open access mandate, the domino effect of Harvard's OA mandate, huge growth in participation in OA week around the globe, enormous growth in the number of OA journals, etc.) and that we can now talk calmly about building the future system together. A number of people, including representatives of Nature and Elsevier, told me (or tweeted or mentioned in their feedback forms) that they really liked the session led by Pete Binfield on article-level metrics - instead of being combative (PLoS rulz!), it was a constructive discussion of strategies for moving forward all together to make the publishing world better adapted to the modern world.

Pogledajte ceo program ScienceOnline2010

http://www.scienceonline2010.com/index.php/wiki/


a o izveštaju, veoma iscrmnom, možete pročitati na Borinom blogu

http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2010/01/making_it_real_people_and_book.php

Dugačak je ali sjajan, iako za nas možda najsjajnija i sledeća vest..

...The ScienceOnline London version of the event is already going strong, planning for the third meeting this June. In 2011, there will be ScienceOnline Belgrade in Serbia. Anyone else who wants to organize it somewhere else, let us know...

I za kraj valjalo je nazdraviti uspešno obavljenoj organizaciji uz jednu DOMAĆU!!!...naravno Šljivovicu!

PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE

Čast nam je pozvati Vas na predavanje:

OPEN SOCIETY & OPEN SCIENCE


predavač

Bora Živković
North Carolina, USA

Public Library of Science

&

Online Publishing




predavanje će se održati

6. jula u Univerzitetskoj biblioteci "Svetozar Marković" u 12:00 h,
(hol na I spratu)
i
8. jula u Institutu za onkologiju i radiologiju Srbije u 12:00h ,
(amfiteatar)

Bora Živković je internet menadžer za Public Library of Science, organizacija koja objavljuje naučne radove po principu Otvorenog pristupa ( Open Access). Predavanje će predstaviti najnovije razvoje u komunikaciji nauke na internetu, uključujući naučne blogove i vikije, koncept Javne laboratorijske sveske i Otvorenog pristupa

http://www.plosone.org/home.action